Ask standards in plain language.
Bring OSCAL catalogs into the conversation and get answers your team can use immediately.
The Cyber Security Platform
for Teams and AI Agents
For risk, compliance, and audit readiness.
Built for the AI era.
Secani
Standardsspeak.Secanitranslates.
Give every contributor the right access.
Keep compliance work moving while write, read-only, and admin responsibilities stay clear.
Translate evidence into every framework.
Connect documents, spreadsheets, and APIs to NIS2, Grundschutz++, ISO, and GDPR workflows.
Run assessments against your controls. See exactly where you stand.
Build questionnaires for any framework, track every response, and surface gaps before they become audit findings.
Enterprise-ready security
Securely onboard your organization with SAML SSO, role-based access controls, audit logs, and isolated workspaces.
Experience a better way to build trust.
See how Secani helps your team turn security work into clear, audit-ready progress.
The open standard for the next generation of compliance.
OSCAL use cases across government and the public sector.
Explore OSCAL use casesComplianceteamsarenotslow.Theyareworkingwithyesterday'ssystems.
The audit is coming up. Where is the evidence for the IT baseline check?
Sven R.ISMS Lead
We are extending the scope. Which modules do we need to model?
Maja L.IT Security
New cloud service. Which safeguards apply in the baseline check?
Alex B.Product Owner
Microsoft Office Import
Analyze data and spot what is still missing before it shows up in the audit.
ISMS baseline register
HomeInsertDrawPage LayoutFormulasDataReviewViewAutomate
A1↕
fxAsset
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asset | Module | Status | Owner | Due | Evidence | Priority | Revision |
| 2 | FW cluster PROD | OPS.1.1.4 Firewall | In progress | IT Operations | Apr 15 | Rule set v3 | High | Q2/26 |
| 3 | M365 tenant | APP.5.2 Microsoft 365 | Open | CISO | Apr 22 | MFA evidence missing | High | Q2/26 |
| 4 | Backup server | OPS.1.3 Backup | Done | Infra team | ongoing | Restore test 02/26 | Medium | Q2/26 |
| 5 | VPN access | OPS.1.1.5 Remote access | In progress | Network | Apr 19 | Bastion concept | High | Q2/26 |
| 6 | Client hardening | SYS.2.1.2 Endpoints | Open | Workplace IT | Apr 30 | Baseline missing | Medium | Q2/26 |
| 7 | SIEM | DER.2.2 Logging | Done | SOC | ongoing | Use cases v5 | Medium | Q2/26 |
| 8 | Emergency plan | ORP.4 Continuity | In progress | BCM | May 08 | Test date open | High | Q2/26 |
| 9 | Supplier risk | OPS.2.1 Third parties | Open | Procurement | May 12 | Assessment missing | Medium | Q2/26 |
| 10 | Patch management | OPS.1.1.2 Patch process | In progress | IT Operations | Apr 25 | SLA report | High | Q2/26 |
| 11 | IAM roles | ORP.2 Permissions | Done | Identity team | ongoing | Recert. March | Low | Q2/26 |
| 12 | Awareness | ORP.3 Training | In progress | HR + CISO | May 05 | Attendance 84% | Medium | Q2/26 |
| 13 | Audit package | CON.1 Evidence | Open | Compliance | May 17 | Docs incomplete | High | Q2/26 |
| 14 | KPIs | ISMS monitoring | Done | CISO Office | ongoing | Quarterly report | Low | Q2/26 |
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 |
‹›
OverviewScopeProtection needsModelingRisk analysisBaseline checkSafeguardsEvidence
Review the imported security concept for missing or incomplete protection needs assessments.
Searching
Baseline check
Implementation
Operations & audit
Scope
Protection needs
Modeling
Risk analysis
Structure analysis
Protection needs assessment
Modeling
Risk analysis
IT baseline check
Implementation
Service management
Without Secani
0hours
With Secani
0hours
When people and technology work in sync, the result is anything but artificial.
Jonathan Bezdek
Co-Founder, CTO